INTERNATIONAL LAW ON FOREIGN INVESTMENT
Nowadays we live in a global world, as we can see the
majority of the things we use are from other country, for this reason the
International business started to be more attractive between companies or
particulars whose operates in different countries. Is simple through foreign investment (F.I.)
we obtain external resources (capital), to generate cash-flow, with this
resources firstly our company obtain other elements like machinery, technology,
workforce, secondly with this elements we can improve our production
process and increase our sales, finally
we generate profits not only to solve our expenses otherwise the external
company who invested in our company get their money back and obtain a
percentage of this profits, this kind of investment usually are from developed
countries to developing economies, this is one of the reasons for which the
investment wasn´t be fair and balanced, in this essay we are going to analyze
the law which help to regulate the foreign investment, it means the law to
protect developing countries to obtain profit without losing their sovereignty,
focus principally in foreign investment.
We mentioned foreign investment (F.I.) bur what does
it mean? In simple words there are all kind of resources in their majority
money from other country which help us
to increase our process of production and obtain higher profits, we need to
take in mind there are three kinds of FI , the first one is direct investment
when we know where the capital example we can invest on machinery, buildings,
technology and others, second is indirect investment when we don´t know the use
of the capital, it is only we delivered
the monetary resources but we aren’t in direct contact with the activities the enterprise realized
with this investment, finally we have portfolio this type of investment means
we have different choices but exist a
major risk in turn of major profits that are owned by the same organization.[1]
The terms of FI started at the end of the sixties,
when the Second World War was finishing, some group of developing countries
were celebrated their independence after many years of fighting, by this time appeared
a new ideology and social movement among people “the nationalism”, in this
movement the principal objective is every nation needs to keep their national
sovereignty which mean the different economies maintain the power to govern
themselves. In terms of commerce it means economic liberty, and equal access to
other market. In the seventies appeared
a new order international economic world, this order tried to protect natural
resources, technologies, and the control of the transnational amounts on
foreign investment. In contrast this order didn´t help completely all the
countries the consequence was cheap labor force and purchase of natural
resources from aliens without concession, in the case of Mexico with this
action we can mention the article 27° of the Constitution are violated,
remembering all the resources inside of the country belong to their citizens,
although this resources could be managed by aliens if the government provided
them a concession.
Continue with the consequences from this new order,
the only thing they achieved was that in developing countries the foreign debt
increased, by the same time the oil was the principal element by which the
developed countries wanted to control all the economies whose have major
production of this resource, this action made the OPEC born, which regulated the production and price
of the oil, the problem was the countries which cold exploited this resources
didn’t have the enough money to solve
all the expenses, and the power economies give them FI, without the
existence of one law which regulated this part, so this countries made this
investment taking advantages of the producers of oil.
Not only was the oil though which the developing countries
started to compete by FI, was the necessity of a better quality life for their
citizens it means more infrastructures, education and other aspects, but the
problem was they hadn´t the money, so they turn to credits and they extended
their foreign debt, on the other hand the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund started to pressure this countries in order to paid complete this
debts, although this institutions helped to the
liberalization of foreign investment regimes, which was focused in two
aspects commerce and investment. Nevertheless
even missing an international law which regulated all the topic of Foreign
Investment.
Talking about FI at the international level is scarce,
because only exists hundreds of
bilateral and multilateral treaties attempt to regulate that behavior, either
exclusively or in combination with other matters, typically trade relations.
The provisions of these treaties apply equally to the treatment of investment
by nationals of either party in the territory of the other party or parties.
Several attempts by the OECD, largely a developed countries organizations, to
reach agreement among its members on a convention on the treatment of FI have
not succeeded. However the great number of investment treaties in force and
they noted the similarity in their provisions may in due course contribute to
the development of international customary law on the rights of foreign
investors generally and the obligations of states towards them.
Other institutions like the World Bank described in
their guidelines on the treatment of foreign investment, adopted in 1992 a
primary example due to their impact on national legislation even though they
mainly address state actions and omissions, by the other hand not all is good
looking the foreign investment causes changes into the national and
international polices, not always a foreign investment is a good option for the
country that are like the receptor country it means the economy where the
investment enter, for these reason the Non-Governmental Organizations are
created and they protested for different topics.
The effect of FI is different in the developing
countries, in our point of view this countries are in some cases the ones that
loose when an alien come in to their country and wants to invest, by these
reason time ago by year of 1973 Latin American countries developed the “Calvo
clause” [2]
that talks about the national resources, it is supposed that this clause refers
to some areas which are protected from the aliens in order to limited their
invest for example in Mexico again in the article 27° mentioned there is forbidden to an alien the production
and distribution of electric energy. [3]
In our opinion the Calvo clause is not satisfied at
all, because the contracting countries have the ability to waive the agreement
when existed an illegal event which directly affecting the nation. We can mention
a clear example; in 1960 when "Canada waives the protection of Barcelona
Traction Company".[4] Therefore,
they needed to integrate the paradigm of globalization, nations didn´t be able
to interfered in a controversy when a conflict arises, adhere to international
law of FI, which is based on the international law principles. Within these
sources, talking about investment,
international agreements are the primary legal resource between countries.
However these agreements generate a number of gaps that later provoke difficulties
which attempted resolve within the guidelines established in the agreement and give
protection to the investor.
The United Nations Organization (UNO), adhering to the
Calvo Clause, is concerned with the creation by the World Bank of two institutions which helps to solve any disputes that arise between
countries which couldn’t established a solution in an internal way. These
institutions or arbitral tribunal are International Centre for Settlement of
Investment Disputes (ICSID) and Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)
whose objective is find a solution for
every disputes in FI terms.
It is important highlight, the parties may request
assistance from the ICSID must be members of the UN, but above all be in
agreement to request the intervention of the organization. However ICSDI may
admit non-members if that is your decision. ICSDI is intended to be a forum
where various entities generate ideas and alternatives to resolve various
disputes.
Meanwhile, MIGA specifies clear
rules to solve problems or disagreements in the contracts. Its main feature is
that motivates investors to place their money, even in a country with high
risks, since, in addition to providing investment strategies for investment
success, says the amount of capital to be invested. That is, if the risk of
losing capital MIGA does happen requite the amount of investment, so encourages
investors to nominate their money in the best countries for higher profits.
To sum up, is necessary said talking about a FI regulation we have an
enormous hole when we want to solve some questions, the most important thing is between
developed and developing countries exist respectful contracts, because trough
the years the major economies only look for their own benefits,
regardless of whom should affect, other important point is
that here in Mexico we must focus to protect our industrial and
agricultural sectors, instead to permitted a huge FI, also started to worry about
the correctly assignments of these resources, although the FI could
be more beneficial if we only focus on the correct use
of these resources, we know is not always happened, so before
checking the international field we should be worry about national
regulations, because we always tend to make the same mistakes
again and again, example in terms
of corruption, so we strongly believed International Law of FI is helpful if
the FI don´t affected the developing economy.
[1] Sornarajah, M.(2010) .United
Kingdom: Cambridge University
[2] García-Mora Manuel R.
(1950).Marquette law review: The calvo clause in Latin American constitutions
and international law.
[3]
Constitución Política de los Estados
Unidos Mexicanos art 27°
[4] Caso relativo a Barcelona Traction Light/
Resolución. http://www.unizar.es/ssalinas/documents/Prctican8.Documenton6.pdf
My little sisters and brother,
ResponderEliminarAs far as I am concerned, you made an huge effort to abridge this topic that actually is complicated, because of all factors around it. I appreciated you could emphasize how international organizations are working and facing the isssues that came out since Foreign Investment appeared. I am agreed with you all as it seems intertnational law is against the national one, instead of support it.
I would like also add in that althoght we are part bof the dinamical economic world, we go to the point and protect our resources, dealing woith foreign alliens, and maintaind a closed-opened lair by which we are attempting not only whipping up our society but also generating infraestructure and goverment support.
The previous part could be seen like an utopian-naive national dream, however, the natural laws are the ones that are not described, the future has not written yet. The more we analize our economical and political lifestyle, the less we will be depending on "the higher countries", and speccially transnational companies, who are the real malignant agent which we allow it to come here and ravage our country.
Yours faithfully,
Daniel Cervantes García
There is definitely still a chasm, a law governing the issue of the investment foreign internationally and is that not only is regular if not also protect these markets, as well mentioned it sectors in Mexico as the industrial, which are not given support as such, a little protectionism would not be bad.
ResponderEliminarDespite the existence of treaties, which seek a better development for the Member countries, the reality is that only seek their own benefit.
The manner in which raised his essay is very good, mentioning the success ad is arising with the passage of time the foreign investment which is of vital importance for the development of countries. for the development of the countries, despite the existence of a law which achieves an absolute regulation.
good essay!!
nice day....: D
Hi guys, Congratulations for your essay!
ResponderEliminarWhen it comes to globalization I agree with you that trade liberalization and the elimination of barriers has allowed trade and economic relations between countries and change the way business has evolved. Now companies are looking for countries where they may further increase its capital and generally seek to invest in developing countries where labor is cheaper and there is enough raw materials.
Because of this change of circumstances must be appropriate legislation to regulate such transactions, in this sense I believe that they failed to mention the other sources of international law, because if they mentioned international treaties that agree with you that is the source used to regulate foreign investment.
With regard to legislation, from my point of view I think the Calvo Clause has been one of the most important contributions to defend the sovereignty of Latin American countries that suffered most from the injustices of the developed countries. The Calvo Clause has contributed to the countries of Latin America and has an important contribution to international law.
Overall the essay I found very rewarding and I appreciate the focus and point of view.
Regards